Modern sociological approaches to the study of the phenomenon of “leisure”

Volume 7 (2022), № 4, P. 344-352


Article (file: pdf, size: 345 KB, downloads: 308)


The relevance of the research is due to the trends of change in modern society, in which an increase in labor productivity, changes in working conditions and recreation, brings the topic of leisure to the fore, both in scientific papers and in everyday life. At the same time, there is a problem of updating the content of concepts related to non-working time. In this regard, the article offers an analysis of the sociological discourse in the field of leisure sociology. The similarity and difference of the concepts of leisure, free time, rest is determined. The paper provides an overview of Russian and foreign scientific research on the content of this term. The purpose of the article is to analyze modern sociological approaches to the concept of leisure. The achievement of the chosen goal was ensured by the following general scientific research methods: comparative, analytical and synthetic. The authors notes that leisure is widespread in modern society, and therefore, there are a huge number of definitions of this phenomenon in the literature. However, science has not developed a single generally accepted definition of leisure. The article also notes that the sociology of leisure has a set of different approaches to the study of the phenomenon of leisure. The author pays close attention to the concept of “leisure civilization” and the description of the characteristics of such a type of leisure as serious leisure. In conclusion, the authors notes that the study of leisure, as well as the majority of complexly defined phenomena, must be approached from different points of view and use not only a comprehensive methodological approach, but also the results of all those sciences that study the phenomenon of leisure and related activity and time practices: rest, free time, recreation, etc.


leisure, free time, leisure civilization


Artem S. Mironov,
Irkutsk State University of Railway Transport,
Irkutsk, Russian Federation,

Elena N. Struk
Irkutsk National Research Technical University,
Irkutsk, Russian Federation

For citation:

Mironov A. S., Struk E. N. (2022) Modern sociological approaches to the study of the phenomenon of “leisure”. Sotsialnaya kompetentnost = Social Competence. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 344-352. (In Russ.).


  1. Abankina T. V. (2005) Economics of desires in the modern “civilization of leisure”. Otechestvennye zapiski = Domestic Notes. No. 4. Р. 115-123. (In Russ.).
  2. Aristotel’ (1984) Nicomachean ethics. Moscow: Mysl’. Vol. 4. 830 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Butonova N. V. (2012) Leisure practices in modern culture. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina. = Pushkin Leningrad State UniversitY Journal. No. 1. Р. 201-210. (In Russ.).
  4. Vladimirova A. P. (1992) Labor and recreation. Dukhovno-tsennostnye orientiry massovykh deistvii lyudei: tezisy doklada respublikanskoi mezhvuzovskoi nauchnoi konferentsii = Spiritual and value orientations of mass actions of people. Аbstracts of the report of the republican interuniversity scientific conference. Grodno: Grodno State University named after Yanka Kupala University. Р. 152. (In Russ.).
  5. Zubok Yu. A. (2003) Problems of social development of youth in the market conditions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. No. 4. Р. 251-253. (In Russ.).
  6. Klyusko E. M. (2016) The current state of the categorical apparatus of the theory of leisure (based on foreign studies). Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv = Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. No. 1 (69). Р. 170-181. (In Russ.).
  7. Kravchenko A. I. (2015) Brief Sociological Dictionary. Moscow: Prospekt, 352 р. (In Russ.).
  8. Kendo T. (2000) Leisure and popular culture in dynamics and development. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo = Personality. Culture. Society. Vol. 2. No. 1 (2). P. 283-308. (In Russ.).
  9. Lysenko L. I. (2009) Socio-pedagogical features of youth leisure. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta imeni A.P. Chekhova = Journal of the A. P. Chekhov Taganrog institute. No. 2. P. 212-217. (In Russ.).
  10. Panarin A. S. (1996) Philosophy of politics. Moscow: Novaya shkola. 424 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Prudenskii G. A. (1972) Problems of working, nonworking time. Moscow: Nauka. 335 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Stebbins R. A. (2000) Leisure time: towards an optimal style of leisure. (View from Canada). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. No. 7. P. 64-72. (In Russ.).
  13. Veblen T. (2021) Leisure class theory. Moscow: AST. 384 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Fablinova O. N. (2013) Leisure as an object of study in Western sociological thought. Sotsiologicheskii al’manakh = Sociological almanac. No. 4. P. 447-453. (In Russ.).
  15. Chernikov I. A. (2019) Contemporary Leisure: Between Freedom and Consumption. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv = Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. No. 5 (91). P. 111-120. (In Russ.).
  16. Shchepetkova I. O. (2015) Leisure as a scientific category: a variety of approaches to study. Diskussiya = Discussion. No. 6 (58). P. 121-128. (In Russ.).
  17. Yaroshenko N. N. (2019) The concept of “civilization of leisure” in the context of foreign socio-cultural studies. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv = Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. No. 5 (91). P. 92-101. (In Russ.).
  18. Anderson N. Men’s Work end Leisure. London: Routledge, 1961. 265 р.
  19. Blackshaw T. Leisure. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010. 192 p.
  20. Csikszentmihaly M. Activity and happiness // Journal of Occupational Science. 1993. №. 1(1). Р. 38-42.
  21. Cunningham H. Leisure in the Industrial Revolution. London: Croom Helm, 1980. 222 р.
  22. Dumazedier J. Sociologie empirique du loisir: Critique et contre-critique de la civilisation du loisir. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1974. 269 p.
  23. Elkington S. Review of the book S. Page and J. Connell “Leisure: an introduction”. Harlow, Pearson, 2010. 544 pp. // Leisure Studies, 2012. №. 2. Р. 256-258.
  24. Freericks R., Hartmann R., Stecker B. Freizeitwissenschaft. Handbuch für Pädagogik, Management und nachhaltige Entwicklung. München: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2010. 376 р.
  25. Godbey G. The future of work and leisure: More customized and contingent across time / K. Weiermair, H. Pechlaner, T. Bieger (Eds.). Time shift, leisure and tourism. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag., 2006. P. 17-28. Hill J. Sport, Leisure, and Culture in Twentiethcentury Britain. New-York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002. 241 р.
  26. Kelly J. Leisure and society: a dialectical analysis. Leisure Studies. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc., 1999. Р. 53-68.
  27. Neulinger J. The psychology of leisure (2nd ed.). Springfield, Ill.: C.C. Thomas, 1981. 302 р.
  28. Rojek C. Labour of Leisure: the Culture of Free Time. London: Sage Publications, ousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi and Singapore, 2010. 208 p.
  29. Strutt J. Sports and Pastimes of the People of England. 2nd ed. London: Methuen & Co, 1903. 420 с. Verlag L. Siller H., Zehrer A. Sociology of Leisure / Entrepreneurship und Tourismus, Edition: 2 Publisher: Linde Verlag, 2016. Р. 243-249.