Individuals’ behavioural practices in terms of the pandemic

Volume 5, Number 4, 2020, P. 541–548

[ SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ]

Article (file: pdf, size: 548 KB, downloads: 313)

Abstract:

The article examines the main aspects of functioning of social institutes in the Russian society in terms of COVID-19 pandemic. The author assumes that the proposed analysis is purely preliminary, since many aspects related to the activities of the authorities and management, the work of enterprises and organizations of all sectors of the economy cannot be fully assessed yet, since the epidemic is still ongoing. However the pandemic allowed a new organization of functioning of educational institutions including transition to the distant education. But along with the apparent advantages it caused some problems. The article emphasizes that this relates, for example, to disruptions in routine of school socialization. The author considers it possible and necessary to pay attention to the measures proposed to reduce the incidence of the dangerous infection, to the spread of the number of infections. According to the author, there are four categories of individuals depending on their reaction to the pandemic. They are COVID dissidents, COVID panickers, COVID indifferent and COVID rational. There are no precise sociological studies that show the capacity of each of these strata. They should be carried out in order to more accurately determine the actions of health institutions, authorities and the media. This will show the most vulnerable points of societyб will allow both reduction of the risk of the COVID-19 pandemic spread and will ultimately result in its cessation.

Keywords:

pandemic COVID-19, behavioural practices, behavioral reactions to external risks

Author:

Vladimir V. Krivosheev, Dr. Sci. (Sociological Sciences), Professor, Associate Professor of Institute of Humanities, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russan

For citation:

Krivosheev V.V. ( 2020) Individuals’ behavioural practices in terms of the pandemic. Sotsial’naya kompetentnost’ = Social Competence. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 541–548. (In Russ.)

References

  1. Abramov A.V., Bagdasaryan V.E., Byshok S.O. i dr. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic: The end of the familiar world? Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyi zhurnal = Bulletin MRSU( electronic journal). No. 2. P. 8. P. 17. Available from: www.evestnikmgou.ru (Аccessed 29th October 2020). (In Russ.)
  2. Akishin V.D. (2020) Five shocks await Russia’s economy as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. NEWS = NEWS. Available from: https://www.newsru.com/finance/09apr2020/rus5shocks.html (Аccessed 01th October 2020). (In Russ.)
  3. Arzamanova T.I. (2020) The first lessons of the first pandemic of the XXI century. Evropejskaya bezopasnost’: sobytiya, otsenki, prognozy = European security: events, assessments, forecasts. Iss. 57(73). P. 2–12. (In Russ.)
  4. Gubernatorov E.P. (2020) The “stress test” of the pandemic revealed the main shortcomings of Russian universities: How the education system should change in order not to roll back to the pre-digital format. RBK= RBK. 3 July 2020. Available from: https://www.rbc.ru/society/03/07/2020/5efdf6e09a794734267c9521 (Аccessed 07th December 2020). (In Russ.)
  5. Levinson A.D., Borusyak L.V. (2020) COVID in their minds: what the Russians thought about the pandemic, quarantine and vaccination. Levada center. Available from: https://www.levada.ru/2020/09/07/ (Аccessed 29 th December 2020). (In Russ.)
  6. Makarentsova А.O., Mkrtchyan N.V., Zubarevich N.V. (2020) Demographic situation and socioeconomic development of Russian regions in the first half of 2020g. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii = Russian Economic Development. Vol. 27. No. 8. P. 81. (In Russ.)
  7. Medvedev D.A. (2020) There is a threat of degradation of the world economy due to coronavirus. Kommersant» = Kommersant. Available from: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4319883 (Аccessed 28th October 2020). (In Russ.)
  8. Sheremet A.N. (2020) Pandemic of inequality: socio-economic aspects and consequences of COVID-19. Meditsina. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Prikladnye issledovaniya = Medicine. Philosophy. Sociology. Applied research. No. 4. P. 140. (In Russ.)
  9. Savitskaya N.M (2020) After the pandemic, higher education will no longer be the same. Nezavisimaya gazeta = Nezavisimaya gazeta. Available from: https://ng-ru.turbopages.org/h/ng.ru/education/2020-03-25/8_7826_education1.html (Аccessed 20th October 2020). (In Russ.)
  10. Shtykhno D.A., Konstantinova L.V., Gagiev N.N. (2020) The transition of universities to remote mode during a pandemic: problems and possible risks. Otkrytoe obrazovanie = Open education. Vol. 24. No. 5. P. 77. (In Russ.)
  11. Sokolovskaya I.E. (2020) Socio-psychological factors of students’ satisfaction in the context of digitalization of education during the COVID-19 pandemic and self-isolation. Tsifrovaya sotsiologiya = Digital sociology. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 51. (In Russ.)
  12. Spasennikov B.А. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic: some lessons. Byulleten’ Natsional’nogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta obshhestvennogo zdorov’ya imeni N.А. Semashko = Bulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health. No. 4. P. 52–57. (In Russ.)
  13. Shul’ts D. N., Vikhareva E. V., Glazunova А.А. (2020) Challenges of post-crisis recovery. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii = Russian Economic Development. Vol. 27. No. 8. P. 12–24. (In Russ.)
  14. Yarmak O.V., Panova E.M., Maranchak А.G., Savina Z.S. (2020) Coronavirus as a social drive for the transformation of everyday life. Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskij region. Obshhestvennye nauki = University News. North-Caucasian region. Social Sciences. No. 3. P. 27–31. (In Russ.)
  15. Rekas Konrad. (2020) Do globalists jubilate as the world sweeps across the coronavirus? Geopolitika.ru = Geopolitika.ru. Available from: https://www.geopolitica.ru/article (Аccessed 01th December 2020). (In Russ.)