The influence of the age profile of fertility on the modern demographic situation in the Republic of Mordovia

Volume 4, Number 4, 2019, P. 370–379


Article (file: pdf, size: 281 KB, downloads: 375)


The article analyzes the theoretical foundations of the emergence and spread of the phenomenon of “late childbearing” among women of childbearing age in the modern society. It examines the results of empirical studies on the determination of these women’s reproductive attitudes. The authors assess the degree of influence of the reproductive norms prevailing in the historical retrospective among the population on desire for children in modern Russia. At present, important and significant changes are taking place directly in the system of value orientations of childbearing age women: extra-family values are gradually coming to the fore, and a family with several children falls by the wayside. The transformation of the age profile of fertility to older ages certainly affects the dynamics of the birth rate in Russia as a whole and the Republic of Mordovia in particular. The consequences of delaying first pregnancy include: reduction of the reproductive period; artificial abortion as one of the methods of birth control; mother’s age; the threat to material well-being; decline in the value of sustainable marriage. The authors have conducted a sociological study to establish the relationship between the changing the age profile of fertility of childbearing age women and the elements of the state family policy that influence it, due to the fact that the assessment of the current demographic situation necessitates a more in-depth study of factors and due to the reproductive behavior of the population, which largely determines the birth rate.


woman of childbearing age, fertility, age, family, state family policy


Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Cand. Sci. (Sociology Sciences), Associate Professor of Social Work Department, National Research Mordovian State University named after N.P. Ogaryov, Saransk, Russia

Alyona S. Tabakova, Career counselor in the Graduate Employment Promotion Center, National Research Mordovian State University named after N.P. Ogaryov, Saransk, Russia

For citation:

Bistyaykina D.A., Tabakova A.S. (2019) The influence of the age profile of fertility on the modern demographic situation in the Republic of Mordovia. Social Competence. Vol. 4. No. 4. P. 370–379. (In Russ.)


  1. Antonov A.I., Borisov V.A. (2006) The dynamics of the population of Russia in the XXI century and the priorities of demographic policy. Moscow: Klyuch-S. 192 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Antonov A.I., Medkov V.M. (1987) Second child. Moscow: Mysl’. 299 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Arkhangel’skii V.N. (2006) Fertility factors. Moscow: TEIS. 399 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Bakhoven I.Ya. (1872) Maternity rights. Moscow: Progress. 247 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Bessmertnyi Yu.L. (2006) Demographic behavior and demographic processes in France in the IX–XV centuries. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. 601 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Bistyaikina D.A. (2013) Transformation of the social protection system of veterans of the Great Patriotic War. The scholarly journal “Humanitarian: actual problems of the humanities and education’’. p. 83–94. (In Russ.)
  7. Boiko V.V. (1988) A small family: the socio-psychological study. Moscow: Mysl’. 237 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Borisov V.A. (2001) Demography. Moscow: NOTABENE. 272 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Borisov V.A. (1976) Fertility prospects. Moscow: Statistika. 248 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Vishnevskii A.G. (1982) Reproduction of the population and society: history, modernity, projection into the future. Moscow: Finansy i statistika. 287 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Vishnevskii A.G. (2006) Demographic modernization of Russia, 1900–2000 years. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. 608 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Vishnevskii A.G. (2006) Demographic revolution. Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert. 221 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Vodarskii Ya.E. (1973) The population of Russia over the period of 400 years (XVI — early XX century). Moscow: Prosveshchenie. 159 p. (In Russ.)
  14. Golod S.I. (1984) Family stability: sociological and demographic aspects. Leningrad: Nauka. 241 p. (In Russ.)
  15. Darskii L.E. (1978) Fertility and reproductive function of the family. Moscow: Statistika. 185 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Kutyavina E.E., Kuramshev A.V., Miftakhova A.G. (2014) Responsible childbearing in the reproductive settings of modern women. The journal “Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod”. No. 2. P. 81–87. (In Russ.)
  17. Medkov V.M. (2014) Demography. Moscow: INFRA-M. 332 p. (In Russ.)
  18. Sidorkina V.M., Fadeeva I.M. (2017) Family values in regional community: factors of change. Russian journal of Regional Studies. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 628–641. (In Russ.)
  19. Solov’eva T.V., Karaseva A.S. (2018) Factors of determination of late child bearing among women of fertile age and their impact on the demographic situation in the republic of Mordovia. Kazan Socio-Humanitarian Bulletin. No. 4. P. 32–35. (In Russ.)
  20. Solov’eva T.V., Pan’kova E.G., Bistyaikina D.A., Palibina A.S. (2017) The main priorities of state social policy relating to family and children in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Mordovia to prevent social orphanhood. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty psikhologii i pedagogiki = Theoretical and practical aspects of psychology and pedagogy. Ufa: Aeterna. P. 184–198. (In Russ.)