Values and priorities of olympic volunteers

Volume 7 (2022), No. 1, pp. 110–118

[ SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ]

Article (file: pdf, size: 269 KB, downloads: 172)

Abstract:

In the article we turn to the consideration of the values and priorities that guide the daily life of Olympic volunteers — participants in the Sochi 2014 Olympic volunteer program. This program is one of the first comprehensive programs on working with volunteers, implemented at the federal level in our country with the participation of state, non-profit, commercial organizations. Olympic volunteers have received special knowledge and skills to provide volunteer services in the organization and conduct of a major sporting event (Olympic and / or Paralympic Games).

The empirical basis of the article is an online survey of Olympic volunteers, which was conducted in January 2022. 520 respondents took part in the research.

The results of the study allow us to draw the following conclusions: a significant part of the volunteers make plans for the near and distant future; the vast majority of volunteers also said that they have certain goals, more than a third of the respondents answered that they have goals, but they can change; for volunteers, family members are significant persons in shaping pans for the future.

Speaking about their priorities in life, most of the volunteers chose family, education and self-development, and health as the most important for them. Volunteers appreciate in other people such qualities as honesty, kindness and decency. The study participants told us that in the next three years they would like to pay more attention to family life and loved ones. Separately, it is worth noting that a third of the volunteers answered that they would like to pay more attention to volunteering

Keywords:

volunteers, life strategies, values, the impact of volunteering on values, life priorities of volunteers

Author:

Marina P. Sukharkova, analyst, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), Laboratory for Interdisciplinary Studies in Non-Commercial Sector, Centre for Studies of Civil Society and the Nonprofit Sector, Moscow, Russia.

For citation:

Sukharkova M.P. Values and priorities of Olympic volunteers // Social competence. 2022. Vol. 7. No. 1. pp. 110-118.

References

  1. Dmitrieva V. A. The life path of a young entrepreneur as a projection of the socio-psychological characteristics of the personality // Human capital. 2021. no. 6. S. 140-153. (In Russ.)
  2. Gavrilyuk T. V., Gavrilyuk V. V. Life path and life strategies of the youth of the new working class // News of higher educational institutions. Sociology. Economy. Politics. 2021. no. 1. S. 29-45. (In Russ.)
  3. Elnikova G. A., Mikhailovskaya Z. V. Typology of youth life strategies // Kazan Social and Humanitarian Bulletin. 2018. no. 2. S. 33-37. (In Russ.)
  4. Zubok Yu. A., Chuprov V. I. Life strategies of youth: realization of expectations and social moods // Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes. 2020. no. 3 (157). pp. 13-41. (In Russ.)
  5. Kostromina S. N., Grishina, N. V., Zinovieva, E. V., Moskvicheva, N. L. Life model as a construct for studying the life scenario of a person // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Psychology. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 4. C. 341-155. (In Russ.)
  6. Brüderl J., Kratz F., Bauer G. Life course research with panel data: an analysis of the reproduction of social inequality //Advances in Life Course Research. 2019. Vol. 41. P. 100247.
  7. Comolli C. L., Bernardi L., Voorpostel M. Joint Family and Work Trajectories and Multidimensional Wellbeing //European Journal of Population. 2021. Vol. 37. №. 3. P. 643-696.
  8. de Vries B. Lifelines: A review of content and context //The International Journal of Reminiscence and Life Review. 2013. Vol. 1. №. 1. P. 31-35.
  9. Giancaspro M. L., Manuti A. Learning to be employable through volunteering: A qualitative study on the development of employability capital of young people //Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. P. 353.
  10. Koistinen K., Teerikangas S., Mikkilä M., Linnanen L. Active sustainability actors: A life course approach //Sustainable Development. 2020. Vol. 28. №. 1. P. 208-223.
  11. Komp K., Johansson S. Population ageing in a lifecourse perspective: developing a conceptual framework //Ageing & Society. 2016. Vol. 36. №. 9. P. 1937-1960.
  12. Komp-Leukkunen K. Capturing the diversity of working age life-courses: A European perspective on cohorts born before 1945 //PLoS One. 2019. Vol. 14. №. 2. P. e0212400.
  13. Komp-Leukkunen K. What life-course research can contribute to futures studies //Futures. 2020. Vol. 124. P. 102651.
  14. Levy R., Bühlmann F. Towards a socio-structural framework for life course analysis //Advances in Life Course Research. 2016. Vol. 30. P. 30-42.
  15. Masini B. Futures research and sociological analysis. S.R. Quah, A. Sales (Eds.), The International Handbook of Sociology, Sage, London.
  16. Mayer K. U. New directions in life course research // Annual review of sociology. 2009. Vol. 35. P. 413-433.
  17. Milojević I., Inayatullah S. Narrative foresight // Futures. 2015. Vol. 73. P. 151-162.
  18. Mitchell, B. (2013). Life course theory. International encyclopedia of marriage and the family. Available online: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G23406900275.html (accessed on 29.11.17)
  19. Omoto A. M., Snyder M., Martino S. C. Volunteerism and the life course: Investigating age-related agendas for action //Special Issue: The Social Psychology of Aging. Psychology Press. 2018. P. 181-197.
  20. Weststrate N. M., Ferrari M., Fournier M. A., McLean K. C. “It was the best worst day of my life”: Narrative content, structure, and process in wisdom-fostering life event memories //The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2018. Vol. 73. №. 8. P. 1359-1373.
  21. Yamashita T., Keene J. R., Lu C. J., Carr D. C. Underlying motivations of volunteering across life stages: A study of volunteers in nonprofit organizations in Nevada //Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2019. Vol. 38. №. 2. P. 207-231.