Volume 5, Number 2, 2020, P. 180–188
[ JURIDICAL SCIENCES ]
Article (file: pdf, size: 244 KB, downloads: 425)
Abstract:
The article examines the features of interaction of member states of the European Union within a common space of freedom, security and justice. One of the three key elements in this regard is the legal regulation of processes developing in cooperation in civil proceedings. Against this background, the author has analyzed the issues of interaction between the bodies of the European Union and national States in the framework of building a common mechanism for cooperation in civil matters. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the practice of Court of Justice of the European Union in regards to issues arising in the course of law enforcement. During the study, significant contradictions were identified in terms of determining the appropriate method of service of summons, service of process, as well as related to the choice of language in which court documents are drawn up. The legislation of the European Union establishes only a General framework for such regulation, leaving most of the procedural issues in the competence of national States. All this significantly complicates the process, since in cases where the party to the case resides in a state where different procedural rules are adopted; the judges have to study the legislation of another country, for example, for applicable service of summons. This raises the need for creation of a mechanism that minimizes the shortcomings of the system developed to date. The author concludes that the problem can be solved at the supernational level by creating a pan-European procedural act in civil cases.
Keywords:
European Union, the area of freedom, security and justice, judicial cooperation, civil matters, European Court of Justice
Author:
katerina V. Gaponova, Lawyer, Agency of Legal and Consulting Services “De Jure”, Kirov, Russia
For citation:
Gaponova E.V. (2020) Legal framework for cooperation between member states of the European Union in civil matters // Sotsial’naya kompetentnost’ = Social Competence. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 180–188. (In Russ.)
References:
- Biryukov M.M. (2016) European law: before and after the Lisbon Treaty. Moscow: STATUT. 240 p. (In Russ.)
- Voinikov V.V. (2015) Prospects for the development of a common space of freedom, security and justice between the Russian Federation and the EU. Sovremennaya Evropa = Modern Europe. P. 50–60. (In Russ.)
- Voinikov V.V., Entin M.L. (2019) On the 20th anniversary of the space of freedom, security and justice in the EU. Sovremennaya Evropa = Modern Europe. No.4. S. 5–15. (In Russ.)
- Voinikov V.V. (2018) The space of freedom, security and justice in the EU legal system. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. No. 6. P. 91–97. (In Russ.)
- Kashkin S.Yu. (2014) Integration justice: essence and prospects. Moscow: NORMA. 50 p. Lazarev S.V. (2018) Cases management in civil proceedings abroad. Moscow: NORMA. 400 p. (In Russ.)
- Mavrakis I. (2019) Implementation of the norms of Regulation of the European Union No. 2016/1103 “On the regime of marital partners’ property”. Notarial’nyi vestnik = Notarial Bulletin. No. 10. P. 5–11. (In Russ.)
- Potemkina O.Yu. (2011) Common space of freedom, security and justice of the European Union. Moscow: Grif i K. 368 p. (In Russ.)
- Potemkina O.Yu. (2017) The increasing threat of terrorism in Europe and the EU response. Sovremennaya Evropa = Modern Europe. No. 3. P. 17–27. (In Russ.)
- Sil’vestri E. (2016) Towards the European code of civil procedure? Recent initiatives for the drafting European rules of civil procedure. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure. No. 1. P. 162–174. (In Russ.)
- Terekhov V.V. (2015) On the concept of the European civil process. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure. No. 4. P. 84–112. (In Russ.)
- Terekhov V.V. (2018) Pros and cons of the European civil process. Lex russica. No. 1. P. 83–102. (In Russ.)
- Ternovaya O.A. (2019) European Union regulations on the property of marital partners and the development of judicial cooperation in civil matters. Sud’ya = Judge. No. 11. P. 48–53. (In Russ.)
- Shchukin A.I. (2018) The principles of justice delivery in civil cases involving foreigners. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. No. 4. P. 98–108; no. 5. P. 94–107. (In Russ.)
- Storme M. Improving Access to Justice in Europe. Baca W.M.K. The Principle of Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in EU Law in the Light of the ‘Full Faith and Credit’ Clause of the US Constitution. Retrieved from: www.comunidadandina.org/BDA/docs/CAN-INT0061.pdf (05.03.2020). (In Eng.)