Study of target groups’ perception of the University brand (through the example of IRNITU)

Volume 5, Number 2, 2020, P. 260–270


Article (file: pdf, size: 385 KB, downloads: 377)


The article presents the results of the sociological research conducted to analyze the characteristics of internal target groups’ perception of IRNITU brand. The student questionnaire (n = 385) and expert survey of IRNITU employees (n = 26) were used as research methods. During the study, the issue of target groups’ perception of the university brand was analyzed, the attitude to it, to its components; the need for changing the existing IRNITU brand was revealed. The tangible and intangible elements of the brand with their characteristics were identified as key components. The assumption was that the brand image is transmitted by target groups to society and carries all the information about the educational institution. The issues – what brand features and how the University image are presented to consumers, what brand associations respondents have – were examined during the sociological survey. The respondents’ attitude to the advantages and weaknesses of the university was of particular importance for brand analysis. This helps to understand the direction of brand transformation as a systemic formation. Besides, the elements of respondents’ brand vision enabling the technical university to change its brand components such as logo, idea, and values were studied.


brand, target groups, image, logo, tangible and intangible elements of the brand


Sidorova Natalia Vasilievna, Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Psychology, Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk, Russia

For citation:

Sidorova N.V. (2020) Study of target groups’ perception of the University brand (through the example of IRNITU). Sotsial’naya kompetentnost’ = Social Competence. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 260–270. (In Russ.)


  1. Bekker E.G. (2012) University brand peculiarities. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Bulletin of The Financial University. No. 2. P. 121–133. (In Russ.)
  2. Borovskikh Yu.A., Smirnova E.E. (2014) University brand as an object of sociological research. Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Iss. 1. P. 157–165. (In Russ.)
  3. Burlakova E.V., Kachalova S.M. (2016) Peculiarities of formation and promotion of the higher educational institution brand (through the example of Lipetsk State Technical University). Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 49–57. (In Russ.)
  4. Groshev I.V., Yur’ev V.M. (2010) Higher educational institution as an branding object. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1. P. 23–29. (In Russ.)
  5. Ivanova Z.I., Kofanov A.V., Elenev K.S. (2011) Brand promotion of the state university from constructing a model of brand perception to the development of the concept of marketing communications. Marketing i marketingovye issledovaniya = Marketing and market research. No.1. P. 37–41. (In Russ.)
  6. Kaigorodova D.A. (2012) University Brand: essence, competitive advantages and conceptual model of its formation. Sotsiogumanitarnyi vestnik = Sociohumanitarian Bulletin. No. 1. P. 37–41. (In Russ.)
  7. Kapustina L.M., Zhad’ko E.A., Izakova N.B. (2016) The research of peculiarities and statistical analysis of an educational institution brand. Upravlenets = Upravlenets (The Manager). No. 1(59). P. 2–12. (In Russ.)
  8. Koshlyakova M.O. (2013) Product and corporate brands of higher educational institution. Vestnik Assotsiatsii vuzov turizma i servisa = Universities for Tourism and Association Bulletin. No. 4. P. 72–77. (In Russ.)
  9. Prokhorov A.V. (2016) University branding: Russian experience. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. Vol. 21. No. 3–4 (155–156). P. 25–30. (In Russ.)
  10. Prokhorov A.V. (2017) University model as a value basis for its positioning. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Obshchestvennye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Social Science. Vol. 3. Iss. 4 (12). P. 31–35. (In Russ.)
  11. Selyukov M.V., Shalygina N.P. (2012) Brand-technology in the control system of a higher education institution. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Scientific journal. Modern problems of science and education No. 5. P. 260–268. (In Russ.)
  12. Willer A. (2004) Individuality of the brand. A guide to creating, promoting and supporting strong brands. Moscow: Al’pina Biznes Buks. 235 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Frolova O. (2008). YuUPI: brand anatomy. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12. P. 96–99. (In Russ.)
  14. Khokhrin E.V. (2004) Mechanisms of the corporate style formation in a large scientific and educational institution. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Publishers of Irkutsk National Research Technical University. No. 4 (20). P. 106–112. (In Russ.)
  15. Chernykh A.V. (2012) In search of the lost rating. Kommersant Vlast ‘= Kommersant Power. No. 12. P. 22–24. (In Russ.)