Theoretical aspects of the study of the mechanism of selective interiorization of senior citizens’ negative gerontostereotypes

Volume 4, Number 2, 2019, P. 153–161


Article (file: pdf, size: 290 KB, downloads: 522)


The article substantiates the mechanism of senior citizens’ negative gerontostereotypes interiorization that causes their restrictive installations and practices. Negative gerontostereotypes are regarded as the ideas in mass and individual consciousness about dysfunctional role of old age and elderly people’ life. It is shown that elderly people negative gerontostereotypes interiorization along with a number of negative consequences in general reducing quality of their life, nevertheless, provides certain «bonuses» to them. The negative gerontostereotyping as an element of the social construct of old age poses the problem of infantilization, as well as forcing to a subordinate role, self-restrictive attitudes and practices, contentment by providing a micro and macro-social environment as opposed to adapting the environment to specific needs. On the basis of theoretical and empirical data it is proved that pressure force and social incentives importance, results of gerontostereotypes approbation regarding their «social efficiency» and compliance to individual and personal characteristics cause not only the depth of their interiorization, that can be full or partial, but also its selective character up to counteraction to it. The research of factors causing the selective nature of negative gerontostereotypes interiorization and counteraction to it is an important step in overcoming self-discriminatory attitudes and the practices of senior citizens.


interiorization, negative gerontostereotypes, attitude, selfageism, practices, mechanism, senior citizens


Lola V. Kolpina, Cand. Sci. (Sociological Sciences), Associate Professor of Social Technologies Department, Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russia

РMarina N. Reutovа, Cand. Sci. (Sociological Sciences), Associate Professor of Social Technologies Department, Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russia


Grant RFFI 19-011-00661 The influence of ageist stereotypes on formation of selfrestrictive attitude and practices of senior generation citizens.

For citation:

Kolpina L.V., Reutovа M.N. (2019) Theoretical aspects of the study of the mechanism of selective interiorization of senior citizens’ negative gerontostereotypes. Sotsial’naya kompetentnost’ = Social Competence. Vol. 4. No. 2. Pp. 153–161. (In Russ.)


  1. Il’yushkin V.V. (2015) Social stereotype as a concentrated expression of social attitude. Vestnik nauki i obrazovanija = Journal of science and education. No. 1 ( 3). Pp. 87–92. (In Russ.)
  2. Kolpina L.V. (2015) Eidzhizm v obsluzhivanii pozhilykh grazhdan uchrezhdeniyami zdravookhraneniya i sotsial’noi zashchity = Ageism in the service of elderly citizens by health and social protection institutions and ways to overcome it. ID “Belgorod” NIU “BelGU”. 112 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Krasnova O.V. (2005) Stereotypes of the elderly and their attitude. Psihologija razvitija: hrestomatija = Developmental psychology: a reader. Moscow: CheRo: Omega-L. Pр. 469–471. (In Russ.)
  4. Mikljaeva A.V. (2018) Infantilization of elderly people in everyday interaction: to the problem statement. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki = Journal of social policy research. Vol. 16. No. 1. Pр. 109–124. (In Russ.)
  5. Mikljaeva A.V. (2014) He content of age stereotypes: an empirical typology. Letters to Issue. Offline: electronic scientific journal= Pis’ma v Jemissija. Offlajn: jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. No. 2. Pp. 2148–2148. (In Russ.)
  6. Popova E.V., Pushkareva T.V. (2012) Interiorization in the context of the problem of social determination. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija = Modern problems of science and education. No. 1. Pр. 146–147. (In Russ.)
  7. Rubchevskij K.V. (2003) Socialization of personality: interiorization and social adaptation. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’= Social Sciences and modernity. No. 3. Pр. 147–151. (In Russ.)
  8. Smirnova T.V. (2008) Older persons: stereotypical image and social distance. Sociologicheskie issledovanija = Sociological research. No. 8. Pp. 49–55. (In Russ.)
  9. Caporael L., Culbertson G. Verbal response modes of baby talk and other speech at institutions for the aged // Language and Communication. 1986. No. 6. Pр. 99–112.
  10. Caporael L., Lukaszewski M., Culbertson G. Secondary baby talk: Judgments by institutionalized elderly and their caregivers // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983. No. 44. Pр. 746–754.
  11. Edwards H., Noller. Perceptions of overaccommodation used in nurses in communication with the elderly // Journal of Language & Social Psychology. 1993. No. 12 (3). Pр. 207–223.
  12. Giles H., Fox S., Harwood J., Williams A. Talking age and aging talk: Communicating through the life span / Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary theory and research // In M. Hummert, J. Wiemann, J. Nussbaum (Eds.). New York: Sage. Pр. 130–161.
  13. Kite M. E., Wagner L. S. Attitudes toward older adults / Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons // In T. Nelson (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2002. Pр. 129–161.
  14. Nelson T. Ageism: Prejudice Against Our Feared Future Self // Journal of Social Issues. 2005. Vol. 61. No. 2. Pр. 207–221.
  15. O’Connor B. P., Rigby H. Perceptions of baby talk, frequency of receiving baby talk, and self-esteem among community and nursing home residents // Psychology and Aging. 1996. No. 11. Pр. 147–154.
  16. Ouchida K. M., Lachs M. S. Not for doctors only: Ageism in healthcare // Generations. 2015.Vol. 39. No. 3. Pр. 46–57.
  17. Ryan E. B., Hamilton J. M., See S. K. Patronizing the old: How do younger and older adults respond to baby talk in the nursing home? // International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 1994. No. 39. Pр. 21–32.