The problems of the system of education civil position in technical universitiesх

Volume 3, Number 4, 2018, P. 41–48

[ PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES ]

Article (file: pdf, size: 227 KB, downloads: 477)

Abstract:

Education is a process of learning and education. Education determines the target program of activity, forms the vector of needs of the person, and the amount of knowledge and skills obtained in the process of education is directed to the implementation of those tasks, in those forms and in those ways that correspond to the axiological scale formed in the process of education. Appearing in the process of learning the civil position of the individual is subsequently manifested in all aspects of her life. Most young people go through the system of higher education. The formation of the civil position of students in an information-rich and open world, the current problems of national security bring to the fore the task of educating the younger generation. Despite the proclaimed at the state level of the task of education of civil consciousness, the analysis showed that they are not sufficiently reflected in the educational standards that determine the content of student learning and, accordingly, are poorly manifested in the educational process. Federal state standards of education, reinforced by professional standards, are aimed primarily at satisfying the order of the modern labor market. On educational activity there are no mandatory standards, so today this area (its existence, development, fullness, etc.) is at the discretion of the administration of the University. Especially vividly these trends are reflected in students of technical universities, whose civic position in view of the specifics of learning is formed not due to the educational process, but under the influence of external, natural, often negative factors.

Keywords:

educational process in high school, educational standards, civil position, civil self-determination, competence approach

Author:

Alla B. Denisova, PhD, associate Professor of philosophy and history, Moscow technical University of communications and Informatics, Moscow, Russia

For citation:

Denisova A.B. The problems of the system of education civil position in technical universities. Sotsial’naya kompetentnost’ = Social Competence. 2018;4(3):41–48. (In Russ.).

References:

  1. V khalifat: vybrat’sya iz lovushki verbovshchikov prakticheski nevozmozhno [Перевод]. Available at: http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2627331 (accessed May 21, 2018).
  2. Denisova A.B. Nevozmozhnost’ realizatsii trebovanii FGOS v ramkakh traditsionnoi uchebnoi deyatel’nosti v tekhnicheskom vuze [Перевод]. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya vertikal’noi integratsii sistemy obrazovaniya, nauki i biznesa: ekonomicheskie, pravovye i sotsial’nye aspekty” [Перевод]. Vol. 1. (Voronezh, December 1–2, 2016). Voronezh: Воронежский экономико-правовой институт Publ., 2016, pp. 77–82. (In Russian).
  3. Il’inskii I.M. Proshloe v nastoyashchem. Izbrannoe [Перевод]. Moscow: Московский гуманитарный университет Publ., 2011, 840 p. (In Russian).
  4. Motova G.N. Akkreditatsionnye pokazateli. K istorii odnogo kriteriya [Перевод]. Available at: http://akvobr.ru/k_istorii_odnogo_kriteria.html (accessed May 1, 2018).
  5. Pushchaev Yu.V. Либерализм, квазилиберальные мифы и свобода СМИ (Карл Поппер о роли телевидения в обществе). Voprosy filosofii [Перевод], 2006, no. 8, pp. 3–14. (In Russian).
  6. Rossiiskii statisticheskii ezhegodnik [Перевод]. Moscow: Rosstat Publ., 2016, 725 p. (In Russian).
  7. Tolstoi L.N. Pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Перевод]. Moscow: Uchpedgiz Publ., 1953, 444 p. (In Russian).
  8. Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Mineapolis, 1996.
  9. Lasswell H.D. The structure and function of communication in society. In: Bryson, (ed.) The Communication of Ideas. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1948.