Tools for the use of direct democracy in local self-government of the Kaliningrad region: sociological aspects

Vol. 6, No. 4, 2021, pp. 448–457

[ SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ]

Article (file: pdf, size: 289 KB, downloads: 232)

Abstract:

The article reveals the main management practices of applying different methods of direct democracy at the level of local self-government. This is done on the example of one of the regions of the Russian Federation, in the Kaliningrad region. At the same time, the authors note that these institutions, firstly, have a fairly long history. They have been developed and improved for more than a decade. Secondly, it is emphasized that specific techniques of direct democracy are currently used both in the traditional form (gatherings, general meetings, etc.) and using electronic technologies. It is noted that the region seeks to rely on the best practices of the active development of institutions of direct democracy in Russia and foreign countries. It is disclosed how electronic municipalities function, interactive ways to take into account the opinions and comments of citizens, answers to emerging questions and proposals, direct voting on problems that cause the greatest interest of individuals.Suggestions are made to further improve the use of direct democracy institutions to improve the interaction of municipal authorities with the population. It seems that all this is not only not losing its relevance, but is also the most urgent given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords:

management; management practices; direct democracy; electronic interaction technologies; sociological analysis of the use of institutions of direct democracy

Authors:

Vladimir V. Krivosheev, professor of Institute of the humanities, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia

Daniil YU. Kochergin, Research specialist of the Center for Regional Management of the Kaliningrad Region, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia

For citation:

Krivosheev V.V., Kochergin D.Yu. Tools for the use of direct democracy in local self-government of the Kaliningrad region: sociological aspects // Social Competence. 2021. Vol. 6. No. 4. pp. 448 — 457

References

  1. McIver W. J., Elmagarmid A. K. Introduction: Advances in Digital Government: Technology, Human Factors, and Policy // Advances in digital government: Technology, Human Factors, and Policy / ed. by W. J. McIver, A. K. Elmagarmid. – Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
  2. Avak’yan S.A. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossii. T. 1. M.: YUrist», 2005. Administraciya GO «Gorod Kaliningrad» // https://www.klgd.ru/vote/vote_list.php?PAGEN_1=9
  3. Alpatov YU.M. Organizaciya mestnogo samoupravleniya v gorodah federal’nogo znacheniya. M.: OOO «Media-Print», 2008. S. 333.
  4. Bard A., Zoderkvist YA. Netokratiya. SPb.: Stokgol’mskaya shkola ekonomiki, 2008.
  5. Brodovskaya E.V. Cifrovye grazhdane, cifrovoe grazhdanstvo i cifrovaya grazhdanstvennost’ // Vlast’. 2019. № 4. S.65–69.
  6. Vershinin M.S. Politicheskaya kommunikaciya v informacionnom obshchestve. SPb.: Izdatel’stvoMihajlova V.A., 2001.
  7. Vlasov V.A. Aktual’nye voprosy otvetstvennosti organov i dolzhnostnyh lic mestnogo samoupravleniya pered naseleniem // Konstitucionnoe i municipal’noe pravo. 2009. N8. S.33;
  8. Vorotnikov A. Elektronnyj municipalitet – novoe kachestvo municipal’nogo upravleniya / A.Vorotnikov // iBusiness. 2002. № 9–10.
  9. Grazhdanin, zakon i publichnaya vlast’ / In-t zakonodatel’stva i sravnit. pravovedeniya pri Pravitel’stve RF; [Vasil’ev V. I. i dr.].

    10. — M.: Izd-vo Norma, 2005.

  10. Danilin A.V. Sreda elektronnogo vzaimodejstviya dlya elektronnogo pravitel’stva [Elektronnyjresurs]. URL: http://emag.iis.ru/arc/infosoc/emag.nsf.
  11. Emel’yanov N.A. Mestnoe samoupravlenie v dorevolyucionnoj Rossii. Tula, 1996.
  12. Kirienko V. E. Informacionnye sistemy organov mestnogo samoupravleniya: ot OGAS k informacionnomu obshchestvu: monogr. Tomsk: Izdvo Tomsk. gos. un-ta sistemupr. iradiotekhniki, 2012. 203 s.
  13. Kozhevnikov O.A., Ostapovich I.YU., Nechkin A.V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie institutov pryamoj demokratii v Rossii: ponyatie, klassifikaciya i perespektivy razvitiya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2020. № 456. S. 225–233.
  14. Komarova V.V. Mekhanizm neposredstvennoj demokrati i sovremennoj Rossii (sistemaiprocedury). M.: «Formula prava», 2006. S. 37.
  15. Konstituciy aRossijskoj Federacii. Prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 goda s izmeneniyami, odobrennymi v hode obshcherossijskogo golosovaniya 1 iyulya 2020 goda // www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_28399/249eba46b69e162f87771713b6e37fb0780f2c40/
  16. Nudnenko L.A. Instituty neposredstvennoj demokratii v sisteme mestnogo samoupravleniya (problemy teorii i praktiki). Avtoref. diss. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2001. S. 22.
  17. Polozhenie o skhode grazhdan v Verhnesaldinskom gorodskom okruge Sverdlovskoj oblasti (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) // https://base.garant.ru/35170550/
  18. Pravitel’stvo Kaliningradskoj oblasti // https://gov39.ru/vote/muni/.
  19. Pyaseckaya E. N. Elektronnoe pravitel’stvo i elektronnaya demokratiya: institucializaciya politiki informacionnogo razvitiya // Nauchno-metodicheskij elektronnyj zhurnal «Koncept». 2017. № 9.
  20. Rudenko V.N. Pryamaya demokratiya: modeli pravleniya, konstitucionno-pravovye instituty. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN, 2003. 476 s.
  21. Sergeev A.A. Mestnoe samoupravlenie v Rossijskoj Federacii: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-voProspekt, 2006.
  22. Sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj Federacii. 2003. № 4. Ct. 3822. // https://www.szrf.ru/szrf/docslist.2003.numb3822.
  23. Treshcheva O.YU., Balayan E.YU. Municipal’nayavlast’ v usloviyah modernizacii obshchestva i gosudarstva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2020. № 9. – S. 22–25.
  24. Holopov V.A. Aktual’nye voprosy formirovaniya organizacionno-pravovyh uslovij dlya effektivnogo funkcionirovaniya elektronnogo municipaliteta. Opyt municipal’nogo obrazovaniya g. Ryazan’ // Municipal’naya sluzhba: pravovye voprosy. – 2012. № 1. S. 26–28.
  25. Centr upravleniya regionom // https://vk.com/tsur39
  26. Shevandrin A.V. «Elektronnyj municipalitet» kak perspektivnaya model’ effektivnogo mestnogo samoupravleniya // Nacional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’. 2011. №31.