Volume 7 (2023), № 1, P. 74–87
[ PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES ]
Article (file: pdf, size: 433 KB, downloads: 67)
One of the most pressing problems associated with the Covid19 pandemic is the problem of widespread distance learning, which in turn causes problems in developing private methods for organizing such training in various subjects. The article describes the quantitative verification of the effectiveness of the distance learning methodology of the discipline “Information Technologies in professional activity” used at the Yaroslav the Wise Novgorod State University. The essence of the methodology is based on the use of universal communication media and presentation of video materials such as the social network “vkontakte” and video hosting “youtube”. The methodology is based on the synchronous-asynchronous principle of the organization of training, the results of the survey of students are presented and analyzed, proving the effectiveness of this technique. The survey was conducted by means of “Google forms”, while it was anonymous and pursued purely research purposes. The survey demonstrated the high efficiency of this technique and the positive attitude of students towards it. In addition, the survey showed the convenience of using the methodology due to the fact that most students use these environments. It is shown that this technique can be modified to meet the individual needs of each university teacher and can be used in other disciplines of higher and secondary vocational education.
distance learning, teaching methods, synchronous-asynchronous education, information technology
Leonid B. Ershteyn
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russian Federation,
State Pedagogical Institute. V.G. Korolenko, Glazov, Udmurt Republic, Russian Federation
Ershteyn L.B. (2023) The method of synchronous-asynchronous teaching the discipline
“information technology in profession” at the university: efficiently through the eyes of students. Sotsialnaya kompetentnost = Social Competence. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 74–87. (In Russ.).
- Ershteyn L.B. (2021). [Synchronous-asynchronous distance learning of information technologies on the example of Microsoft Access]. Professionalnoye obrazovaniye i rynok truda = Vocational education and labor market. No. 3 (60), pp. 60-75, doi: 10.52944/PORT.2021.46.3.005 ((In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
- Careaga-Butter M., Badilla Quintana M.G., Fuentes-Henríquez C. (2020) «Critical and prospective analysis of online education in pandemic and post-pandemic contexts: Digital tools and resources to support teaching in synchronous and asynchronous learning modalities». Aloma: revista de psicologia, ciències de l’educació i de l’esport Blanquerna, [en línia]. No. 38 (2), pp. 23-32, doi: https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2020.38.2.23-32.
- Nieuwoudt J.E. (2020). Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. No. 36(3), pp. 15-25, doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5137.
- Offir B., Yossi L., Bezalel R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers & Education. No. (51, 3), pp. 1172-1183, doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.009.
- Mehdi Mehri Shahabadi, Megha Uplane (2015). Synchronous and Asynchronous e-learning Styles and Academic Performance of e-learners. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. No. 176, pp. 129-138, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.453.
- Yamagata-Lynch L. (2014). Blending Online Asynchronous and Synchronous Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. No. 15(2), pp. 189-212, doi:https://doi. org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778.
- Worthington T. (2013) Synchronizing asynchronous learning — Combining synchronous and asynchronous techniques 8th International Conference on Computer Science & Education, Colombo, pp. 618- 621, doi: 10.1109/ICCSE.2013.6553983.
- Anna K. Brady, Deepak P. (2020). Learning without Borders: Asynchronous and Distance Learning in the Age of COVID-19 and Beyond. ATS Scholar. No. 1(3), pp. 233-242, doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2020- 0046PS.
- Eric C. Buxton (2014). Pharmacists’ Perception of Synchronous Versus Asynchronous Distance Learning for Continuing Education Programs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. No. 78 (1), p. 8, doi: 10.5688/ajpe7818.
- Chou C.A. (2002). Comparative Content Analysis of Student Interaction in Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning Networks. HICSS ‘02: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’02)-V5-2002, doi: 10.1109/ HICSS.2002.994093.
- Lee Y.-A. (2021). The experience of distanced medic students through focus group interviews. The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services. No. 25(2), pp. 157–167, doi: https://doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2021.25.2.157.
- Schoenfeld-Tacher, Regina M., and David C. Dorman. (2021). Effect of Delivery Format on Student Outcomes and Perceptions of a Veterinary Medicine Course: Synchronous Versus Asynchronous Learning. Veterinary Sciences. No. 8, pp. 2-13, doi: https:// doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8020013.
- Lin Xi, Gao Li (2020) Students’ Sense of Community and Perspectives of Taking Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education. No. 15 (1). pp. 169-179.
- Rehman, R. & Fatima S.S. (2021). An innovation in Flipped Class Room: A teaching model to facilitate synchronous and asynchronous learning during a pandemic. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. No. 37(1). pp. 131-136, doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/ pjms.37.1.3096.
- Brierton S., Wilson E., Kistler M., Flowers, J., & Jones, D. (2016). A Comparison of Higher Order Thinking Skills Demonstrated in Synchronous and Asynchronous Online College Discussion Posts. NACTA Journal. No. 60(1), pp. 14-21.